• Shikhar Dhawan was given not out even after Hardik Pandya claimed a catch.

  • The third umpire gave Dhawan not out in the absence of conclusive evidence.

IPL 2021: Former cricketers react on 3rd umpire giving Shikhar Dhawan ‘not out’ after Hardik Pandya’s catch
Brett Lee on Hardik Pandya's catch (Image Source: Twitter)

On Tuesday, Delhi Capitals (DC) registered their third victory in the ongoing Indian Premier League (IPL) after they defea🌟ted defending champions Mumbai Indians (MI) by 🐓six wickets in a low-scoring thriller.

DC spinner Amit Mishra picked up a four-wicket haul for 24 runs in his quota of 4 overs to inspire his side to ꧟restrict the mighty MI for a paltry total of 137/9.

In reply, DC took the game to the last over and eventually recorded a win. Shikhar Dhawan top-🌼scored for his side with 45 from 42 deliveries.

However, things could’ve been different had if Shikhar was given out in the first over of the DC chase. The over bowled by Trent Boult almost produced a wicket as Shikhar got the edge while trying to play a shot on the leg-side.

The ball looped off the leading edge and went towards cover, where Hardik Pandya came quickly and dived forwarಌd to complete the catch.

But, the on-field umpires Chris Gaffney and Chettithody Shamshuddin weren’t convinced that the catch had been taken clearly as they went upstairs to check the authenticity of the dismissal.

The replays clearly showed there was an element of doubt a🌃s Pandya did not have his fingers under the ball completely. Eventually, in the absenc🦂e of soft-signal, the third umpire ruled the decision favouring the batsman.

Former cricketers Brett Lee and Aakash Chopra reacted to the third umpire’s decision. Lee said: “It’s a tough one. If you look at that from different angles, you’ll give different answers. I think it comes down to asking the players as well. You can use technology. You can see Pandya’s fingers underneath the ball, but you can also see the ball perhaps touching the ground’s surface. If it touches the ground, it’s not out. It’s a tough one to call.”

Chopra highlighted the absence of a ‘soft signal’ and said if there was such decision, then Dhawan would have been the goner.

Notably, the rule of the on-field umpires giving soft signals at the time of referral ဣwas removed for the fou♚rteenth season of the cash-rich league.

“Soft signals have been taken away from IPL this year. There was no soft signal here. Otherwise, he could have been out for all we know,” Chopra said.

Subscribe to to watch Exclusive Interviews, Podcasts, Weekly News Updates & Explainers.

TAGS:

CATEGORY: Hardik Pandya IPL

For latest cricket news and updates, subscribe to our Weekly Newsletter.

About the Author:
Akshat is the Sr. Content Strategist at betvisa68.com. With a passion for storytelling and a keen eye for detail, Akshat has honed his skills over 6 years, working with various media outlets, publications, and organizations to deliver high-quality content that informs, educates, and entertains audiences. He is just another cricket fan who’s grown up watching the likes of Sachin Tendulkar and Rahul Dravid. Cricket runs in his veins. Cover drive is his favorite sight, and a ball meeting the middle of the bat is his favorite sound. You can write to him at akshat.gaur@betvisa68.com and follow him on , & .